Mar 21, 2008

Surrogate Mothers of Gujarat, India

I knew this Patel couple who were childless after many years of marriage. One day, I met the husband's brother and he informed me that the couple had gone to Anand, Gujarat and had brought back from India to the United States, a baby girl. It took me a bit of time to begin to comprehend what he has so casually blurted out.

The baby girl was born to a surrogate mother. The brother said that they had paid the mother about 100,000 rupees. Very little in my opinion. The article below, from BBC, touches on different aspects of surrogate mothers of Anand, Gujarat, India
- - - - -
From BBC:

The town of Anand in the western Indian state of Gujarat is an unlikely trail-blazer to the cause of surrogacy.

Yet in just three-and-a-half years, this town of 150,000 people has produced more surrogate babies than any other in the country.

Rubina Mandal first heard of surrogacy and rushed to Anand a year and a half ago, not to find a surrogate mother but to become one.

Both her children suffer from a condition known as heart-murmur and more than likely, will need surgery.

Though Rubina and her husband together were bringing in around 15,000 rupees ($375) a month, the costs of surgery are far higher.

Nine months as a surrogate mother and Rubina has been able to bank away a tidy enough sum to bring a smile to her face.

Like Rubina, most surrogate mothers are fulfilling a long-held dream.

Pushpa Pandya, for instance, longed to own a house which, with the first surrogacy payment, she turned into a reality.

Now she is contemplating a second time - to add an additional room and finish paying all the extra loans.

Husbands may not have agreed but for the fact that the benefits are obvious.

The moral police in the community too are usually quickly silenced once they know what surrogacy is.

The rates of pay vary - from $6,250 to $15,000 (250,000 to 600,000 rupees) - depending on the client.

And though some may want richer customers, from the US or the UK, most are happy with what they get, having never earned so much money in their lives before.

The Kaival Hospital, also known as the Akanksha Infertility Clinic, had 35 surrogate babies born in 2005 and 2006.

In 2007, that figure jumped to 55.

The success of the clinic has ensured that many other infertility clinics are also hunting out surrogate mothers on a commercial basis.

Dr Nayana Patel, the director of Kaival Hospital, says that each side is helping the other.

It all started with a British-Gujarati women who, unable to have her own baby, asked her mother to be her surrogate.

That may have caused moral consternation amongst some women but many others began coming to Dr Patel, asking if she would find them a surrogate mother.

By word of mouth the news spread - that if you are healthy, have had at least one child of your own and need a relatively large sum of money, Dr Patel's clinic may well be the place for you.

Mostly though it is poor women who offer themselves, fuelling charges of exploitation - since most customers coming from the West would have to pay double the amount back in their own country for the same procedure.

Dr Patel has clearly been asked this many a time.

"Supposing I am an Indian doctor, if I'm doing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) in the US, I would be earning $1,800 dollars, for the same treatment in India I am earning a maximum of $600-$700. So am I being exploited? No, because that is how it is in India."

Whatever the rights and wrongs of a competitive market, matters of the heart are the same the world over.

What must it be like to give up a baby you have carried for nine months?

There have been cases of surrogate mothers changing their minds and refusing to give up the baby in other parts of the world but so far, not in India.

'A miracle'

Priyanka Sharma, another surrogate mother, has a take many would agree with.

"Of course there'll be sadness, but it's important to suppress that, keep it inside. Besides, we too are getting something. We have need for money and that need is being fulfilled. So really both sides are getting what they need."

Says Rubina, "It's a miracle. I myself was wondering how I managed to deliver such a beautiful American, totally white baby. I couldn't believe it - I am very happy."

But then Rubina is lucky that she and Karen, the baby's biological mother, have become so close that she seems merely to have extended her family to the United States.

The Indian government - often criticised for being slow in accepting change - too has been remarkably free of prudery.

At a time when surrogacy is still illegal in many countries around the world, India has drafted guidelines giving women the right to a fee for surrogacy.

The proposals are expected to be turned into law soon.

Mar 11, 2008

Indian Consulate in Chicago

Some officials of the Indian consulate in Chicago have been illegally issuing passports to Indian nationals who have sought political asylum in the US in exchange for hefty bribes, according to a complaint made to the Indian external affairs ministry by an Indian American community leader.

Amrit Patel, a businessman and president of the India Cultural Society in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has alleged that the passport racket was handled through Rajubhaiya, a New York based middleman. Almost all of the beneficiaries are from the Punjabi American community, all of whom paid $3,000-3,500 each to have supporting documents manufactured and passports issued.

According to Patel's complaint, the applicant would contact Rajubhaiya with $200 and two photographs. Rajubhaiya would manufacture the supporting documents and set up an appointment with Indian consulate officials in Chicago. After the consulate-approved issue of the passport, the applicant had to hand over the remaining money to Rajubhaiya.

Patel has sent copies of the complaint to the Indian embassy in Washington DC. A senior diplomat at the Chicago consulate, who requested anonymity, confirmed the existence of the racket to IANS.

"After Patel's complaint, the Indian embassy sent an officer to inquire into the matter, but nothing seems to have come out of it," he said.

"Milwaukee has a large Punjabi American community. As far as I know, there have been at least 40 people from Milwaukee itself who have had such passports made. When the embassy inquiry officer came here, I had him meet with at least five people who had paid bribes to get their passports," said Patel.

Patel has named six people who allegedly paid bribes to have their passports issued. He has also attached copies of their green cards and US travel documents with his complaint.

Some of the applicants are residents of New York and California - states over which the Chicago consulate does not have any jurisdiction. In one of the letters from the American Embassy in New Delhi addressed to the US immigration inspector at the port of entry, the address of the asylum seeker is given as New York. Another letter from the US Immigration and Naturalization Service Asylum Office in San Francisco is addressed to another asylum seeker in Redwood City, California.

The Chicago consulate serves the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

Apart from the payment of bribes, there is also the question of whether a political asylum seeker is even eligible for an Indian passport.

"If an Indian national claims political asylum on grounds of persecution by the Indian government, he loses his claim to an Indian passport," said the diplomat.

But applicants could apparently count on Rajubhaiya to resolve this issue.

"Rajubhaiya would make a fake green card (changing the category from one based on political asylum to a different one) so that the applicant is eligible for an Indian passport," said Patel.

There is also the nagging question about how the issue of fraudulent Indian passports could affect national security.

"These people (who got the passports) appear to be opportunists. But it could easily have been someone with terrorist intentions," said the diplomat. "A lot of people have minted money in this racket. Sadly, not one of them paused to ponder on how this would reflect on India's image abroad."

Attributed to: Ashok Easwaran, Indo-Asian News Service, Chicago, March 11, 2008.